Skip to main content
This forum is closed to new posts and responses. Individual names altered for privacy purposes. The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a forum for customer support requests. Any customer support requests should be directed to the official HCL customer support channels below:

HCL Software Customer Support Portal for U.S. Federal Government clients
HCL Software Customer Support Portal

HCL Notes/Domino 8.5 Forum (includes Notes Traveler)

HCL Notes/Domino 8.5 Forum (includes Notes Traveler)

Previous Next

Response to upgrade and backward compatibility

QUESTION:
- upgrade: is there an intention to support the old field values until such time as the user changes his preferences, or is there an automatic one-shot migration from the pre 8.5 settings to the new ones? (please the latter)

ANSWER:
The answer is the latter. The final release will have a one shot migration to the new feature.


QUESTION:
- is there any reason why it only works when the mail file is opened from an 85 client? It seems to work Ok there, but if I Open the mail file from an 802 client it seems to try to revert to the older method. Is that how it's intended to work?

ANSWER:
Yes, because we needed a new and more reliable method for inserting RT content from preferences RT Lite field to e-mail doc. Body field regardless of it's format (HTML, Graphics, etc...). This new code only exists in R8.5.


Feedback response number MHUZ7J6N6C created by ~Yentl Breaterynds on 09/04/2008

Notes mail signature changes (~Isaac Deslulit... 4.Sep.08)
. . Response to upgrade and backward co... (~Mary Quetwe 4.Sep.08)
. . Reply to iNotes question (~Tip Opnutex 4.Sep.08)
. . Thanks for the feedback (~Isaac Deslulit... 8.Sep.08)
. . Disagree with feature (~Mark Asaweplop... 8.Sep.08)




Printer-friendly

Search this forum

Member Tools


RSS Feeds

 RSS feedsRSS
All forum posts RSS
All main topics RSS