Skip to main content
This forum is closed to new posts and responses. Individual names altered for privacy purposes. The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a forum for customer support requests. Any customer support requests should be directed to the official HCL customer support channels below:

HCL Software Customer Support Portal for U.S. Federal Government clients
HCL Software Customer Support Portal

Notes/Domino 6 and 7 Forum

Notes/Domino 6 and 7 Forum


  


Back to the drawing board
~Umberto Nongeroson 9.Jan.03 01:34 PM a Web browser
Domino Administrator 6.0 All Platforms


I tried to "whitelist" a test host that ordb.org lists and then ran the ordb test. This test was successfully blocked (obviously, I wanted the test to fail due to my "whitelist").

If you create an entry in your hosts. file that looks like:

127.0.0.1 1.0.168.192.relays.ordb.org

where 1.0.168.192.relays.ordb.org is a valid ordb.org listing for a host 192.168.0.1, then ping 1.0.168.192.relays.ordb.org, you will see responses from 127.0.0.1. But do an OS nslookup like so:

nslookup 1.0.168.192.relays.ordb.org

and you don't get 127.0.0.1, because the nslookup doesn't check the hosts. file, it just goes straight to the DNS as I suspected it would.

If we want to have the desired effect, what we need to be able to do is prevent RBL style DNS look-ups of "whitelisted" hosts from resolving in the OS.

Windows DNS is not sufficiently open to permit this kind of tinkering. I am willing to bet that it could be accomplished relatively easily on a Linux box as you have all of the source code for name server look-ups right there to play about with. That is well beyond my programming capabilities though, so this is where I stop for now.




RBL usage: Please share your experi... (~Isaac Optoober... 7.Jan.03)
. . RE: RBL usage: Please share your ex... (~Sven Cistumiko... 8.Jan.03)
. . RE: RBL usage: Please share your ex... (~Lily Elgerotex... 8.Jan.03)
. . RBL usage: No experience yet, but w... (~Rebecca Cisfre... 18.Jan.03)
. . . . RE: RBL usage: No experience yet, b... (~Rebecca Dwovel... 8.Feb.03)
. . . . Been here? (WAS: RBL usage: No expe... (~Delores Dwonic... 18.Jan.03)
. . . . RE: RBL usage: No experience yet, b... (~Kelly Zekwebur... 20.Jan.03)
. . . . . . RBL usage: This is what I've seen s... (~Isaac Optoober... 20.Jan.03)
. . . . . . . . a partial workaround via the api (~Hal Prekroster... 22.Jan.03)
. . . . . . . . . . This will be great! (~Isaac Optoober... 23.Jan.03)
. . . . . . . . . . Nice job :-) (~Karl Eknuplopo... 22.Jan.03)
. . . . . . . . . . source code for intercept 1.4 (~Hal Prekroster... 22.Jan.03)
. . RE: RBL usage: Please share your ex... (~Dana Kiveluste... 27.Jan.03)
. . RBL usage: some shared experience (... (~Kelly Zekwebur... 8.Jan.03)
. . . . RE: RBL usage: some shared experien... (~Isaac Optoober... 8.Jan.03)
. . . . . . * ignore (~Tanita Eknizen... 8.Jan.03)
. . . . Yes you can "Whitelist" (~Yoshi Lopkiche... 8.Jan.03)
. . . . . . Forgive my frustation, but... (~Kelly Zekwebur... 8.Jan.03)
. . . . . . . . RE: Forgive my frustation, but... (~Yoshi Lopkiche... 8.Jan.03)
. . . . . . . . . . Interesting thought - I may just tr... (~Kelly Zekwebur... 9.Jan.03)
. . . . . . . . . . . . Back to the drawing board (~Kelly Zekwebur... 9.Jan.03)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Back to the drawing board (~Naomi Deskrote... 9.Jan.03)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thanks for your kind words (~Karl Eknuplopo... 10.Jan.03)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Back to the drawing board (~Hal Prekroster... 15.Jan.03)
. . . . RE: RBL usage: some shared experien... (~Tanita Eknizen... 8.Jan.03)
. . . . . . Go ahead (~Karl Eknuplopo... 9.Jan.03)


Document Options






  Document options
Print this pagePrint this page

Search this forum

Forum views and search


  Forum views and search
Date (threaded)
Date (flat)
With excerpt
Category
Platform
Release
Advanced search

Member Tools


RSS Feeds

 RSS feedsRSS
All forum posts RSS
All main topics RSS