Skip to main content
This forum is closed to new posts and responses. Individual names altered for privacy purposes. The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a forum for customer support requests. Any customer support requests should be directed to the official HCL customer support channels below:

HCL Software Customer Support Portal for U.S. Federal Government clients
HCL Software Customer Support Portal

Notes/Domino 6 and 7 Forum

Notes/Domino 6 and 7 Forum


  

PreviousPrevious NextNext

RE: Have you listed new client's Help, About version string in Desktop Settings doc?
~Sanjay Asatumiterjip 21.Jul.03 03:27 PM a Web browser
Domino Server 6.0.2 CF1 Windows 2000


Thank you for responding. I am attempting to upgrade from 5.0.x to 6.0.2 CF1. What version string do you recommend I try?

The VIEW has Client Version "182" listed as an example in their article. I am not sure what release that is. (6.0.0 maybe? I never used that version.)

When I compose a new E-Mail in 6.0.2 CF1 (after already upgrading and using the iNotes6.nsf template) and I do the @version +Shift +F9 trick, it says "191". Thus, that's what I believe the version string should be. If not, then the View's article is apparently wrong.

The Domino Admin Desktop Policy documentation says to "Enter the build version of the Notes client in the format Build Vnn_mmddyyyy (example, Build V60_06282002). To upgrade all versions, use an asterisk *."

My already-upgraded Notes client "About Notes" says it was released on June 9th, 2003. I am upgrading others to the same version. Thus, I have tried using "V60_06092003." That has not worked, thus the Domino Help documentation is apparently wrong.

I have now tried the following strings:

191
V60_06092003
6.0.2
6.0.*

Next, I am going to try:

6.0.2CF1 (Although no documentation tells me to use this structure.)

If that does not work, I am going to try "*".

At first, I was hesitant to try "*" since we still have some folks installing R5 because we have not officially rolled-out R6. However, on second thought, since the Desktop Policies should only work for clients using R6, then it should not hurt to use "*" because it won't cause problems until there is an R6.5 or R7?

I will let you know if 6.0.2CF1 or * works for me.




Seamless Mail Upgrade does not work... (~Sanjay Asatumi... 18.Jul.03)
. . RE: Seamless Mail Upgrade does not ... (~Mario Lopkiste... 18.Jul.03)
. . . . RE: Seamless Mail Upgrade does not ... (~Sanjay Asatumi... 18.Jul.03)
. . . . . . RE: Seamless Mail Upgrade does not ... (~Mario Lopkiste... 18.Jul.03)
. . . . . . . . RE: Seamless Mail Upgrade does not ... (~Sanjay Asatumi... 18.Jul.03)
. . RE: Seamless Mail Upgrade does not ... (~Mario Lopkiste... 18.Jul.03)
. . . . RE: Seamless Mail Upgrade does not ... (~Sanjay Asatumi... 18.Jul.03)
. . Have you listed new client's Help, ... (~Rebecca Quetwe... 20.Jul.03)
. . . . RE: Have you listed new client's He... (~Sanjay Asatumi... 21.Jul.03)
. . . . . . Sorry about that... (~Rebecca Quetwe... 21.Jul.03)
. . . . . . . . Solution Found. Problem = Bad Docum... (~Sanjay Asatumi... 21.Jul.03)
. . . . . . . . . . ignore; browser timed out (~Rebecca Quetwe... 22.Jul.03)
. . . . . . . . . . left hand, right hand (~Rebecca Quetwe... 22.Jul.03)
. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: left hand, right hand (~Evelyn Asafoos... 23.Jul.03)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: left hand, right hand (~Sanjay Asatumi... 23.Jul.03)
. . RE: Seamless Mail Upgrade does not ... (~Evelyn Breboos... 17.Nov.03)
. . RE: Seamless Mail Upgrade does not ... (~Denise Elrevit... 5.Dec.03)


Document Options






  Document options
Print this pagePrint this page

Search this forum

Forum views and search


  Forum views and search
Date (threaded)
Date (flat)
With excerpt
Category
Platform
Release
Advanced search

Member Tools


RSS Feeds

 RSS feedsRSS
All forum posts RSS
All main topics RSS